<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head to Head to&#8230;Head?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://withavoicelikethis.com/head-to-head-tohead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://withavoicelikethis.com/head-to-head-tohead</link>
	<description>More than 60% Mouth - Show Notes and Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Fenolio</title>
		<link>http://withavoicelikethis.com/head-to-head-tohead/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Fenolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://withavoicelikethis.com/?p=127#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Vimeo seems to be the best video and audio quality. In the Vimeo conversion to their player there&#039;s cleaner transitions between your image and video. Less JPEGing to everything in general. YouTube has an overall graininess to their service, but it&#039;s the universally accepted thing. Google is better than YouTube but Vimeo beats in in pure quality. I hope this helped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vimeo seems to be the best video and audio quality. In the Vimeo conversion to their player there&#8217;s cleaner transitions between your image and video. Less JPEGing to everything in general. YouTube has an overall graininess to their service, but it&#8217;s the universally accepted thing. Google is better than YouTube but Vimeo beats in in pure quality. I hope this helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
