With A Voice Like This

Whether it's Music or Media - this is the Voice you're looking for.

042 – Interview with Gillian Kelly of VoiceQuest Inc. Part 1

A Base of Technique

Gillian Kelly

Recorded on February 8, 2008 – VoiceQuest Inc. is a Chicago-based performance studio founded by Gillian Kelly and Claire Bigley. In this episode and the first half of the interview, I speak with Gillian about her training, past experiences and what brought her to the point of starting VoiceQuest Inc. Other topics discussed, Voice Teacher and Vocal Coach and the differences and how they are combined at VoiceQuest Inc. and all their offerings at the studio including performance classes and opportunities. Also, we talk about Davenport’s, a piano bar and cabaret in Chicago and why technique is so important in the teaching of singing. And a bit about the innovative way they use the web. VoiceQuest Inc. can be found at http://VoiceQuestInc.com.

More to come in the second half of the interview.

[audioplayer file=”http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-52008/TS-89337.mp3″]

Listen above or download by right clicking and saving.

Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes

You might have noticed it’s been awhile since I’ve either made a blog entry or put out a podcast. It’s been an unplanned hiatus, some of the reasons for it will be upcoming entries and podcasts and some of it you can simply see here. I’ve changed the website over from JamesGoodrich.net to WithAVoiceLikeThis.com, but if you take my feed, the only thing you would have noticed is that you got a lot of the entries reloaded to you as new. The fact that you didn’t have to change a feed and the graphics work you see here recquire a special Thank you. That is to Kim Fenolio of KimFenolio.com. Kim is both Graphic Artist and Social Media Maven and gave a lot of advice in how to set up this blog/website so that in case of domain switch or drastic failure of any particular service used in this site, there’s always a workaround.

There are also some changes in what I’m doing with the blog and podcast. If I’m reminded of anything every time I try something new, it’s the fact that things evolve and change no matter how well planned. My focus will still be on my music and how all of this Interwebs stuff works, but it will also include Interwebs stuff period, since this is where I am free to make my music and promote it and sell it. So you’ll still here about what I’m doing by myself, with the a cappella group I’m in called 4-AM (website to follow soon) and how to promote and make the Internet work best for me that way. It’s a musical slice of life approach. And while I write about all things internet and music, you’ll still get to hear the original stuff I’m working on in its various stages and interviews of folks that I know, be they musicians or performers at large and maybe more, we’ll see how it all turns out. As always, Comments from the Podcast Gallery are most welcome, whether they are received live in the podcast, by voicemail or e-mail.

Here’s to more of everything. (c;

Day 74 – Some Belated Thanks

Since my EP release podcast, I’ve found out that two more podcasts had played my music previously, and I wanted to make sure to let everyone know who had played my music and thank the podcasters in the public forum. I’m preparing a complete list for a future blog entry, but I also listed each as soon as I found out about them. So here are two

Podcasts that played my music:

Virtual Yooper – Dec 23, Christmas in the Keweenaw – The Wassail Song
flick-a-brac – Dec 15, EPISODE 018 – Happy Hollandaise! – We Three Kings

Thank you to all who supported me by playing my music this past holiday season.

Why Does it Have to Be a Data ‘War’?

After writing this response to Chris Brogan’s open question, I wasn’t planning to write a follow up on this subject because this blog isn’t specifically about Data Portability and Accountability, but here it is. I’m going to use examples that may seem unrelated, but they’re all about rights and protecting them.

In regard to the Facebook/Plaxo/DataPortability.org issue, the current line is that the issue is all about open portability of data. If that’s the case, two questions come to mind. First, if the entire intent of the situation was to highlight the open exchange of data, why were the methods used by Plaxo and its agent (Agent meaning the individual representing Plaxo by the mechanism of a non-disclosure agreement) anything but open? And Second, why wasn’t the DataPortability.org banner raised and blogged about until after the fact, when everything had already happened?

I’ve been a podcaster for only a little over six months now but I’ve been a professional musician for over twenty years and I’m always interested in the ongoing debate of music use. In fact, this blog/podcast shows a lot of my research into what defines Public Domain and and its relationship to copyrights. I know a fellow podcaster who uses a certain album of music for their show and put a footnote in their blog about the album not being copyrighted, therefore it is in the Public Domain. I’m no copyright lawyer and technically they may be right about that particular album (Ask George Romero about ‘Night of the Living Dead’), however the album title starts with ‘Favorite Songs of…’ so if there are any arrangements of a copyrighted song on that album, more than likely the podcaster is in violation of the copyright laws (Check with Thomas Dolby about sampling for that one). I don’t for a minute believe that podcaster is doing anything with malicious intent, it’s just more complicated than a simple statement can handle. Oh and by the way, let’s talk about how those rights are being ‘protected’ by the RIAA. That seems to be a war and we all know how that is working for them.

I don’t use Skype anymore. It’s not an issue with the application itself, but more with its usage. I’ve been involved in multiple conversations using Skype with other podcasters that have been recorded and used in podcasts without my knowledge, consent and/or sometimes without me even knowing a recording of my part in a call was used in a podcast. When I was growing up, my Dad owned part of a radio station and he was the Chief Engineer and News Director. Now the FCC regulations have changed some and they’re ambiguous at best about private parties recording , but if a licensed Broadcast entity did that, the result could be fines or loss of broadcast license. Once again, I don’t think the podcasters were doing anything with malicious intent and it got my blog and podcast a little attention, so I made the choice to not use Skype unless it’s under very specific circumstances. My rights, my choice.

All of that to prove that the situation is complicated, so let’s talk about similar situations that are being handled well. How about online banking? It’s a good analogy. Who owns the money being moved electronically back and forth, or the accounts? I don’t remember reading about online banking wars, maybe about usage fees, but not the banking itself. And they deal with personal information.

Or how about one I have some personal professional experience with. Personal Health Information. In July of 2000, I became the first full time employee at First Health Group Corp involved solely with the Internet as the Internet Operations Coordinator, becoming the Manager of Internet Operations, the highest position solely dedicated to the Internet through August 2005 even presenting on Capitol Hill in July 2003 at the Healthcare Leadership Council Innovations. Among my duties were the creation and implementation of security and privacy corporate policy and a large part of that was in conjunction with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) passed by Congress in 1996. This issue could have easily been a war, take a look at the timeline. Passed in 1996, when the then current administration made a failed attempt at Health Care Reform, but by no means were the waters friendly for the Health Care Industry. And whether is was a concession or a flexing of its muscle, the Health Care Industry said “We can’t do this on our own” and HIPAA was brought into existence. It’s been a long, complicated process and continues to be, but it’s by no means a war and a good start to a blueprint when it comes to Data Portability and Accountability on the Internet.

Let’s not confuse arrogance or ignorance with altruism and let’s discard the bad road we took to get here and focus on why we are here. Oh and I really like the idea of of the ‘PA’ part of HIPAA and feel it definitely applies here, Portability AND Accountability. Right now, everyone’s discussing the ‘Freedom’ of Open Portability without discussing the ‘Responsibility’ of Accountability.

Pictures of me presenting to various members of Congress in July 2003 (left to right): Dennis Moore – Kansas, John Shimkus – Illinois, Ron Kind – Wisconsin

Jim Goodrich and Congressman Dennis Moore of Kansas - July 2003 Jim Goodrich and Congressman John Shimkus of Illinois - July 2003 Jim Goodrich and Congressman Ron Kind of Wisconsin - July 2003

Have the Data Wars Begun – A Response

I read Chris Brogan’s Have the Data Wars Begun blog entry where he ends with these questions:

I’m not sure my take on this, but wanted to bring it to you for consideration. On one side, I want to be able to move my personal data from site to site, because if I spent the effort building it in there, I want to get it back out. On another side, is the friending process of Facebook THEIR data or is it mine? My friends, yes, but is the link and the semantic data built between us something that Facebook owns?

What’s your take?

Hypothetically, let’s say I own a late model Lamborghini. Burt Roscoe (A hypothetical person) owns a late model Rolls Royce and we both belong to a luxury car club. In this club’s charter they provide a storage facility and services like having your car ready for you when you call ahead, including fueled up, detailed, and they’ll even make sure it gets to the dealership for its scheduled maintenance and they host rallies, dinners and all manner of get-togethers. You’ll have to leave a key at the storage facility in order to take advantage of the services, but that’s part of the membership agreement you sign.

Burt is a respected and well known car guy and supporter of the club, so of course, I’m going to try to get to know him out of the 50 members and I get to the point where we know each other’s face and at one point Burt let me drive his Rolls and I let him drive my Lamborghini and we benefit from knowing each other, undoubtedly me more than him, but still we both benefit in one way or another. Great, everything is going along fine and then the members find out that the club has been renting out our cars to non-members without permission and selling the membership roster to all sorts of advertisers. Well a big battle erupts and is still going on, but it’s now a month later and it’s died down quite a bit.

Burt decides he would like to drive my Lamborghini again and since he’s so well known and respected, he basically has run of the club. He grabs the key to my Lamborghini and starts to drive away. Well one of the valets was on his way to get my car because I called and sees my car leaving. Being smarter than a rock, the valet closes the garage door and won’t open it and goes to get the club manager, who immediately kicks Burt out of the club. Burt grumbles as he leaves and then returns with 18 other members of the club so ensure he can get back into the club. He gets back into the club with the group and explains that he was only going to use the Lamborghini for personal use and that he was also going to store it at another Luxury car club where the eighteen members in his group now are also members there as well and how this is going to be a great thing for all of the members of the club.

The club house breaks out in a battle of cheap theatrics and semantics, finger-pointing and the third grade lemming defense of ‘The club already did it!’ when finally one of the other, very well-respected club members shouts over the mess.

“Who owns the Lamborghini?”

A hush falls over the crowd and the member asks the question again and elaborates.

“Who owns the Lamborghini? The Club or Burt?”

And that’s the problem. It’s the right question, but the wrong set of answers. Neither Facebook nor anyone I’ve designated as a friend would own my name, my e-mail address or my birth date, I own them, plain and simple. My data resides in a Relational Database on Facebook’s servers. And that is the best descriptor of what Facebook and any single ‘friend ‘ on Facebook owns, a relationship. And both Facebook and any individual Facebook member are responsible for using and not abusing that data through a Terms of Service Agreement that applies to both Facebook and the individual users through their acceptance of the terms. It’s called Stewardship.